When using AI for assignments be sure to keep a record of what tools you used, including why and how you used them. Consider saving a transcript of your prompts and any edits that you made. You can do this with screenshots, version saves, or copying and pasting the AI session dialogue into a document. The more transparent you are, the better!
Because AI technology is a rapidly emerging technology, we are still learning how to ethically use and cite generative AI resources. As such, err on the side of transparency if you use one. Here are some ideas for citing generative AI responsibly:
The prominent citation styles have begun to address AI generative tools. Although each style varies slightly in their approach, they all agree that it is imperative to be clear if and how you use AI tools in your research. The following are the current recommendations, although these are subject to change as we continue to adapt to these technologies.
In April 2023, APA provided guidance for citing responses from ChatGPT or output from another generative AI tool.
Include a description of the prompt when quoting output from a generative AI tool in your paper. Use the author of the AI algorithm - or the company who produced the tool - in both the in-text citation and full reference. It may be worthwhile to include the chat's transcript as an appendix to your project.
Author. (Date). Name of tool (Version of tool) [Large language model]. URL
OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat
(OpenAI, 2023)
In March 2023, Chicago Style provided recommendations for citing content developed or generated by generative AI tools.
You do need to credit ChatGPT and similar tools whenever you use the text that they generate in your own work. But for most types of writing, you can simply acknowledge the AI tool in your text (e.g., “The following recipe for pizza dough was generated by ChatGPT”). If you need a more formal citation—for example, for a student paper or for a research article—a numbered footnote or endnote might look like this:
Personal communications are cited in a footnote, but are not listed in the bibliography.
Rule: Number.Originator of the communication, medium, Day Month, Year.
Example: 1 OpenAI's ChatGPT AI language model, response to question from author, 7 February, 2023.
Shortened note rule: NumberCorrespondent's last name, medium
Example: 1 ChatGPT, response to prompt from author
Personal communications are cited within the text, but are not listed in the reference list.
Rule: (Correspondent's Full Name, medium if relevant, Month Day, Year)
Example: (OpenAI's ChatGPT, response to prompt from author, February 22, 2023)
In March 2023, MLA provided guidance for citing responses from ChatGPT or output from another generative AI tool.
"Examples of harm reduction initiatives" prompt. ChatGPT, 23 Mar. version, OpenAI, 4 Mar. 2023, chat.openai.com/chat.
("Examples of harm reduction")
If you create a shareable link to the chat transcript, include that instead of the tool's URL.
MLA also recommends acknowledging when you used the tool in a note or your text as well as verifying any sources or citations the tool supplies.